🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear he was able to withstand defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial European final against one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, laying waste to some of the club’s best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, Amorim came at the executive and seems to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a manager who often railed at his players for failing in individual battles succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position as much to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors will now be rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Over Formation & Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to ditch his favored formation. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when delivered from the mouth with the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, with no penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – function at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Authority Behind Command

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has made very clear his desire for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach of play “will be determined in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in industry and sailing. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Who else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a modern arena that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

A New Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and energy to join an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many companies have these guys established? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to invest the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy by the directors and hire someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, yet finally accountable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged while the people who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to fire him for playing too much that system. Bring in the project manager and later discard them for taking excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.